{
  "country": "Egypt",
  "version": "1.0",
  "country_status": "REFERENCE WORKING VERSION — CONTENT COMPLETE, KNOWN GAPS DISCLOSED",
  "counts": {
    "RPR": 54,
    "NRP": 10,
    "PCR": 2,
    "People": 49,
    "Sources": 78,
    "Thematic Essays": 17
  },
  "integrity_checks": {
    "unique_rpr_ids": true,
    "unique_people_ids": true,
    "invalid_people_palace_links": 0,
    "invalid_source_entity_links": 0,
    "all_rpr_have_standalone_or_cluster_page_after_v1": true
  },
  "known_gaps": [
    {
      "topic": "Prince Omar Toussoun — Bacos, Alexandria",
      "status": "Open",
      "reason": "Palace historically attested, but exact present building identity and property genealogy require reconciliation."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Avaris palace district",
      "status": "Open building-level split",
      "reason": "Palace district is secure; individual building records should follow publication-level architectural attribution."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Tulunid al-Qata’i",
      "status": "Open reconstruction",
      "reason": "Dar al-Imara is retained, but the wider palace-city requires deeper academic reconstruction."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Mena House",
      "status": "Open fabric audit",
      "reason": "Khedivial lodge origin is secure; exact surviving original lodge fabric requires architectural evidence."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Montaza / Salamlek chronology",
      "status": "Open date reconciliation",
      "reason": "Official/public chronologies contain inconsistencies that should remain visible until archival reconciliation."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Princess Faiqa / Jamila / Tawhida palaces",
      "status": "Open exact dates/current reuse",
      "reason": "Royal provenance is secure; construction dates and post-ministry adaptive reuse need property-level records."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Al-Qasr Al-Aly / El-Maghara",
      "status": "Verified but unlocalised",
      "reason": "Dynastic palace names are documented, but precise plans/sites and construction chronology remain incomplete."
    },
    {
      "topic": "Local/original names for several ancient palace records",
      "status": "Open philological audit",
      "reason": "No local-name form will be invented where a secure historical form has not yet been sourced."
    }
  ],
  "editorial_rules": [
    "English is the website language; local/original names are retained in dedicated fields.",
    "Royal provenance is based on building history, not the word Palace in a modern name.",
    "RPR, NRP and PCR remain separate.",
    "Conflicting dates remain visible and are not silently harmonised.",
    "Lost and archaeological palaces are first-class records.",
    "Hospitality conversion is an attribute/history layer, not a duplicate palace ID."
  ]
}